COMPARISON
Kopexa vs. other TPRM solutions
Why integrated vendor management is better than point solutions and spreadsheets.
THE PROBLEM
Three approaches, one goal
Most companies choose one of these approaches for their vendor management.
Excel & Email
Manual, error-prone, no audit trail. Works for 5 vendors, not 50.
- No central register
- No automatic reminders
- No scoring
Standalone TPRM
Good for assessments, but isolated. No connection to risks, controls or policies.
- No framework integration
- No risk register
- Duplicate data management
Kopexa
Everything integrated. Vendors, risks, controls, evidence and policies in one platform.
- Control mapping included
- Risk register linked
- One audit trail for everything
FEATURE COMPARISON
Kopexa in detailed comparison
| Excel / Email | Standalone TPRM | Kopexa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central vendor file | |||
| Categorization | |||
| Questionnaire templates | |||
| Custom questionnaires | |||
| Auto-dispatch | |||
| Reminders | |||
| Auto-scoring | |||
| Gap analysis | |||
| Review workflow | |||
| Roles & permissions | |||
| Control mapping | |||
| Framework integration | |||
| Re-assessments | |||
| Audit trail | |||
| Integrated with risk, policies & evidence |
INTEGRATED
One tool instead of five
Vendor risks are not an island problem. Every assessment flows into your risk register, maps to controls and provides evidence for audits.
No data export needed
Vendor assessments flow directly into the risk register. No CSV exports, no copy-paste errors.
Compliance evidence automatic
Every assessment is stored as evidence and is immediately available in audits.
Ready for integrated vendor management?
Let us show you why Kopexa is more than a TPRM tool.